Indeed, the rail route would be infinitely preferable to biking along 
University Avenue.  Over time, pedaling on a high-traffic roadway like that 
does cause respiratory damage, not to mention the moral distress it causes to 
see so many people yakking alone on their cell phones.  The rail route provides 
a healthy separation from traffic pollution and a scenic boost to the psyche. 
If rail transit ever emerges, then the engines will need to be all-electric, 
rather than diesel electric, to protect trail users' health.  It is overall 
cleaner as well as lower-carbon and more energy efficient to run a train on 
electricity produced at the Walnut Street plant than by a diesel engine, even 
if it ran on biodiesel.

It would be great to team up with Middleton and Dane County at the same time, 
and extend a path all the way to Deming Way, and then connect across Hwy 14 to 
the Hwy 12 path (as much as I denigrate its proximity to Hwy 12, that junction 
could be the site of a successful "Park and Bike" for our daily guests from 
Cross Plains and Sauk Prairie, the next time oil prices leap to record levels).


Jeff Schimpff
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Madison, WI
608-267-7853
"Bus, Bike, Carpool to Work for Clean Air for Kids"



________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nelson, Larry
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:01 AM
To: Meiers, Steve; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Bikies] encouraging cycling

"The key to achieving high levels of cycling appears to be the provision of 
separate cycling facilities along heavily travelled roads and at intersections, 
combined with traffic calming of most residential neighbourhoods."

I believe that we have reached the same conclusion but we continue to add bike 
lanes on arterial streets rather than provide separate cycling facilities.  
Case in Point:  we are required to add bike lanes on University Avenue between 
Segoe and Allen (scheduled for 2011).  To do so will require the acquistion of 
right of way, which will be quite costly.  Those resources could be better 
spent on a separate facility, such as the construction of a bike path on the 
rail corridor about a 1/2 mile to the south.  Now that facility would get 
people out of SOVs.

________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Meiers, Steve
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Bikies] encouraging cycling

This is in a British Journal Transportation Review- you may be able to get a 
copy of it through your local library.


Journal Article

Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons From The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany.
Pucher J, Buehler R. Transp 
Rev<http://www.safetylit.org/week/journalpage.php?jid=6004> 2008; 28(4): 
495-528.
DOI: 10.1080/01441640701806612<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612>     
What is this?<http://www.safetylit.org/definitions.htm#doi>
(Copyright (c) 2008, Taylor and Francis Group)
This article shows how the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany have made bicycling 
a safe, convenient and practical way to get around their cities. The analysis 
relies on national aggregate data as well as case studies of large and small 
cities in each country. The key to achieving high levels of cycling appears to 
be the provision of separate cycling facilities along heavily travelled roads 
and at intersections, combined with traffic calming of most residential 
neighbourhoods. Extensive cycling rights of way in the Netherlands, Denmark and 
Germany are complemented by ample bike parking, full integration with public 
transport, comprehensive traffic education and training of both cyclists and 
motorists, and a wide range of promotional events intended to generate 
enthusiasm and wide public support for cycling. In addition to their many 
pro-bike policies and programmes, the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany make 
driving expensive as well as inconvenient in central cities through a host of 
taxes and restrictions on car ownership, use and parking. Moreover, strict 
land-use policies foster compact, mixed-use developments that generate shorter 
and thus more bikeable trips. It is the coordinated implementation of this 
multi-faceted, mutually reinforcing set of policies that best explains the 
success of these three countries in promoting cycling. For comparison, the 
article portrays the marginal status of cycling in the UK and the USA, where 
only about 1% of trips are by bike.

Language: Eng



Steve Meiers
Safety educator
(608) 267-1102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to