Thanks Kevin for the Seattle sharrows link. I'm still a little uneasy about their use on even low to moderately busy streets. I think as a community, we must accept that bikes and cars can't share the same space safely with the current mindset. We made that decision about pedestrians and gave them their own space. Howerver, I like the concept of sharrows as it makes sense to show the unexperienced bicyclists where they should be in the lane which would protect them from car doors and make them more predictable for motorists. And it advertises to motorists that they should share and be on the lookout for bikes present. But I think they could also be dangerous in the sense that we will always have a fairly significant percentage of motorists not paying attention (cell phones) and one small accident has big consequences for bikers. Perhaps what we should do is put bikes on sidewalks and put pedestrians out in the sharrow because they could walk closer to parked cars. While this makes sense in a way, it would seem absurdly dangerous to your average Madisonian. Yet the damage inflicted with hitting a pedestrian is on scale with hitting a bicyclist. Maybe we could have a special helmet for walking around town!

I'm hoping that if we get a bike boulevard on East Mifflin, we get parking on both sides the entire length for residents as a tradeoff to restricted street access, and sharrows in the middle of the lane. Then I will feel that we will have at least one safe route west from my neighborhood.

David Waugh

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to