Dear Matt Logan,
I suppose you are into "DOUBLE ENTENDRE." I am not. As for the
Republicans, I would expect they don't understand a TAX REVOLT any more
than PROGRESSIVES AND DEMOCRATS do? But your crude double entendre; I
DO find that offensive. And I find it deliberate in your case. Maybe
such is the humor of "Jon Stewart, Kieth Olbermann, or David Shuster."
Most double entendre has been sexual in its overtone and this use in
that context is totally offensive. That you enjoy it and mock the
concept of a tax revolt in this manner mostly describes yourself.
Eric Westhagen
__________________________________
Matt Logan wrote:
[email protected]
>
> Teabagger: one of the 30000+ people who used this web site:
http://teaparty.gop.com/
>
>
>
> Yes, quite offensive.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Westhagen
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 12:11 PM
> To: Jym Dyer; BikiesSubmissions
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Red Light Cameras Protested in Chicago
>
>
>
> Dear Jym Dyer,
>
> Maybe I should quote the sage of this listserv--Kathryn Kingsbury who
coined--"Sometimes its better to leave well enough alone?" --or
addresses people as "dude."
>
> But, I might point out as offensive to some on this sight the
choosing of calling the "tea party movement" TEABAGGERS. I direct all
those interested to the Wikipedia entry about that term as modern
slang. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teabagging I will not repeat the
meaning of "teabagger" on this listserv since I find such a description
offensive in its own right. Obviously such a description does not
bother Jym Dyer or the use of it hopefully out of context to describe
the national protest for LIBERTY which is sweeping the country. In
fact the short rant by Jynn Dyer got in more gripes from the Left--big
oil, free enterprise, and the notion that protesters called all
government--"jackbooted black-helicopter
> government. Buncha revenooers.)"
>
> I will let all judge for themselves if Jym Dyer needs support with
his last remarks?
>
> EW
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jym Dyer wrote:
> Chicago Tribune story:
>
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-red-light-0215-20100214,0,4740280.story
>
> =v= They sound like a bunch of teabaggers overall, with tortured
> arguments that fines for running red lights become government
> "revenue" when they should be spent on "free enterprise." Then
> there's this:
>
> | They called for drivers to honk their horns to protest
> | communities they say are using the cameras ....
>
> Protest signs suggesting that people honk their support are
> nothing new -- there have even been "Honk for Peace" rallies,
> which is pretty dumb for protests against oil wars. The idea
> of deliberately assaulting communities where red light cameras
> are installed is a heinous variant.
>
> =v= (Hmm, since honking horns is itself a violation, deserving
> of additional tickets and fines, perhaps these protesters are
> secretly working for the eeevil jackbooted black-helicopter
> government. Buncha revenooers.)
> <_Jym_>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
