Dear Matt Logan,

I suppose you are into "DOUBLE ENTENDRE."  I am not.  As for the Republicans, I would expect they don't understand a TAX REVOLT any more than PROGRESSIVES AND DEMOCRATS do?  But your crude double entendre; I DO find that offensive.  And I find it deliberate in your case.  Maybe such is the humor of "Jon Stewart, Kieth Olbermann, or David Shuster."  Most double entendre has been sexual in its overtone and this use in that context is totally offensive.  That you enjoy it and mock the concept of a tax revolt in this manner mostly describes yourself.

Eric Westhagen
__________________________________

Matt Logan wrote:
[email protected]

Teabagger: one of the 30000+ people who used this web site:  http://teaparty.gop.com/

 

Yes, quite offensive.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Westhagen
Sent:
Monday, February 15, 2010 12:11 PM
To: Jym Dyer; BikiesSubmissions
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Red Light Cameras Protested in
Chicago

 

Dear Jym Dyer,

Maybe I should quote the sage of this listserv--Kathryn Kingsbury who coined--"Sometimes its better to leave well enough alone?" --or addresses people as "dude."

But, I might point out as offensive to some on this sight the choosing of calling the "tea party movement" TEABAGGERS.  I direct all those interested to the Wikipedia entry about that term as modern slang.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teabagging   I will not repeat the meaning of "teabagger" on this listserv since I find such a description offensive in its own right.  Obviously such a description does not bother Jym Dyer or the use of it hopefully out of context to describe the national protest for LIBERTY which is sweeping the country.   In fact the short rant by Jynn Dyer got in more gripes from the Left--big oil, free enterprise, and the notion that protesters called all government--"jackbooted black-helicopter
government.  Buncha revenooers.)"

I will let all judge for themselves if Jym Dyer needs support with his last remarks?

EW


   

          

Jym Dyer wrote:

 Chicago Tribune story: 
 http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-red-light-0215-20100214,0,4740280.story 
   
 =v= They sound like a bunch of teabaggers overall, with tortured 
 arguments that fines for running red lights become government 
 "revenue" when they should be spent on "free enterprise."  Then 
 there's this: 
   
 | They called for drivers to honk their horns to protest 
 | communities they say are using the cameras .... 
   
 Protest signs suggesting that people honk their support are 
 nothing new -- there have even been "Honk for Peace" rallies, 
 which is pretty dumb for protests against oil wars.  The idea 
 of deliberately assaulting communities where red light cameras 
 are installed is a heinous variant. 
   
 =v= (Hmm, since honking horns is itself a violation, deserving 
 of additional tickets and fines, perhaps these protesters are 
 secretly working for the eeevil jackbooted black-helicopter 
 government.  Buncha revenooers.) 
     <_Jym_> 
   
 _______________________________________________ 
 Bikies mailing list 
 [email protected] 
 http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org 
   
   
    


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to