Brenda - Eric said $100,000 is a rounding error in the road budget, which, in
the context of a city that spends in excess of $40million dollars per year to
expand roads ("major projects" which does not include routine maintenance)
when we don't actually have the money to adequately maintain the roads we
have, is a fair statement.

 

I've investigated bike sharing programs quite extensively for my day job,
including the Trek/B-cycle model, among others

What is being proposed amounts to approximately $2.3 million in
infrastructure that Trek/B-cycle is offering to provide for $100,000/year for
3 years, and this is a one-time offer because Trek wants to use Madison to
test the operations side of their model (they've already worked out the
hardware with the 500 bike B-cycle fleet in Denver).

 

Satya Rhodes-Conway pointed out last night that now is not the best time to
spend $300,000 on a bike sharing program, and yes, there are many other
things that the city could and probably should spend $300,000 on. But when
will it be a good time to spend $2.3 million on this? If we don't buy it now,
we may never have it. Satya and Mike Verveer eventually were both convinced
of the value of this to sign on as co-sponsors.

 

George - the original red bikes program was scrapped because it wasn't
viable. Budget Bicycles trotted out a hundred bikes every spring, and they
were lucky to get a handful of them back the following November.

That's why "red bikes" are now really "yellow bikes" painted red - i.e. they
now require a refundable deposit for the otherwise free long term rental.
It's still a great program, but an entirely different one - the difference
between leasing a car for six months, or using community car for an hour.
Actually, this is more akin to renting a luggage cart at the airport, since
you don't even need to be a member before you walk up to a bike station to
get a bike. A visitor who arrive in Madison without a car (and Deb Archer of
the Greater Madison Convention & Visitors Bureau said last night that's 20%
of visitors to Madison) can't just walk up to a community car and use a
credit card to reserve it for an hour.

 

The biggest challenge I see is where to put the bikes and stations, since
they will be competing with benches, outdoor cafes, and much needed standard
bike parking.

This is the prevailing problem at UW - we don't have enough room to park all
the bikes that come to campus now, and many locations have nowhere to grow.

 

But if we are ever going to have a coordinated bike sharing system - in
Madison, at UW, and, apparently, in Middleton
(http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_88d176f2-28
28-11e0-a5d2-001cc4c002e0.html), then the time is now or never.

 

 

Chuck Strawser

Pedestrian & Bike Coordinator

Commuter Solutions

Transportation Services

UW-Madison

Room 124 WARF

610 Walnut St

Madison WI 53726

608-263-2969

www.wisc.edu/trans

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brenda Konkel
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:12 AM
To: Eric Sundquist
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] City investing in Rental bikes

 

The confusion over the "parks" issue is because the money is being put in the
parks department according to the fiscal note.  Why is the money going to
parks and not David Dryer's section where the bike coordinator is?  And,
$100,000 is not a rounding error when there are many services the Mayor
couldn't find the money to fund, like ice skating rinks, and community
services, and staff for the council, and government television and Arthur
Ross's position and on and on and on.  In a year of "tough choices" to keep
taxes low because of the economy, this is not a small deal.  It's 1/10th of
the fund that is used to pay for police over time, extra costs for snow
plowing and other emergencies.  This should be considered with the budget
along with all the other city priorities.  I'm sure its a great program, but
I'm not sure this is the time to be doing it with this money.  

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Eric Sundquist <[email protected]>
wrote:

George, with all due respect, wackos don't need a reason to complain about
liberals (or about anything else). They killed HSR over the pennies per
household operating cost, and nearly killed health care over fictitious death
panels. There is nothing you can do to satisfy a wacko.

Non-wacko fiscal conservatives, otoh, might realize that that the money here
is a rounding error in the road budget, and realize that the benefits to the
city and its residents are potentially much greater than $100k per year.

B-cycle and other bike-share programs have  been great in other cities where,
by the way, local sponsors always pay for all or part of the cost. They are
not "leisure" bikes, despite Brenda's headline implying they are for park
riding. They are mainly for transportation, though I'm sure some people use
them for fun as well. You pick one up at one kiosk by your starting point and
return it to another kiosk by your destination. That works great with
transit; you can come to town on the bus and get to a destination that's not
right on the bus line. 

Minneapolis started its public/private program (not B-cycle, but another
vendor) last June, and now it is discussing how to best expand it. Denver's
first year was 2010 also, and the results, from a press release:

·         Short-term Memberships (24-hour kiosk, 24-hour online, 7-day,
30-day) Purchased: 32,922

·         Annual Memberships Purchased: 1,784 

·         B-cycle Rides: 102,981 rides

·         Miles Ridden: 211,111*

 

Health benefits included:

·         6,333,332 calories burned

·         1,810 lbs. lost

 

According to a survey of our members, 43.16% of Denver B-cycle trips replaced
car trips, resulting in the following environmental and economic benefits: 

·         312,121 lbs. of carbon emissions avoided

·         9,613 lbs. of toxic air pollutants avoided 

·         15,868 gallons of gasoline not used

·         $41,256 est. saved on gasoline

·         $311,126 est. saved on car parking

 

*Average ride of 2.05 miles

 

 

________________________________

From: George Perkins <[email protected]>


To: [email protected]

Sent: Mon, January 24, 2011 10:12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Bikies] City investing in Rental bikes

 

I remember the original red bike program, even did some intermittent
volunteer work getting junkers ready to ride. I occasionally rode red bikes
(despite having my own bikes). They were somewhat handy and I was always
pleased to see someone else riding them around.

 

I paid real estate taxes then, and even more so now. In these times of
economic stress, all of the regional taxing authorities raised taxes. Ouch!
The higher taxes combined with a right-wing noise machine helped elect a
tea-bagger Republican Gestapo State and Federal government and could tip the
vote against many other progressive, needed programs locally, regionally or
nationally in the coming years. (The RTA's going to try to get a ¼¢ sales tax
referendum to help fund needed bus service - I can hear the gears grinding
already on that one). Giving the right-wingnut wackos another reason to say
"see, I told you so, those liberals are at it again" at this time is just
plain stoopid.

 

Instead of spending $100,000 city money this year, $100,000 the following
year, and another $100,000 the year after that for shiny-new credit-card only
leisure Trek bikes, let's just revive the original red bike program at half
the cost or less. Local bike shops and volunteer organizations could put
together a proposal... Or perhaps keep Arthur Ross's position in the city
budget and fund a bike/ped manager AND a bike/ped coordinator city position
instead?

 

 


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

 

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to