As you exit the East end of the Blackhawk Path, you will see a sign that says
"No commuter bikes on sidewalk".

I think I understand the meaning: in general, bicyclists should ride in the designated, on-street bike lanes along Locust Drive, and not on the sidewalk.
But the 'commuter' thing is to allow arbitrary exceptions

I agree with the sentiment - its generally safer for everyone (bikes and peds) if bikes stick to actual traffic lanes and not sidewalks. But I also know that you can't convince everyone, especially some parents. Think of the children!

But how can they put up a 'regulation' sign (red letters on white, as I recall)? I'm not as up on my traffic code as say Chuck or Arthur, but I suspect there is no official designation of 'commuter' bike. Can VoSH make up their own regulations this way?

Additionally, this seems like a poor word choice. My guess is that most regular commuters are not as reckless as a spandex commando or a caravan of eight-year-olds.

Again, I support the concept - I just read a letter in the paper about a pedestrian who was injured by a careless bicyclist on a sidewalk downtown.
But I think what they really want to say is, stay off the sidewalk unless you
slow down and yield to pedestrians.

-darin



_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to