Amanda White wrote:
This recommendation would likely be met with some strong opposition
from homeowners along the path. The lighting issue was very
controversial, so this would be just adding to the controversy and
complication of this project. However, in general, I feel now is
exactly the time we should be widening the path given the high volume.
The public hearing would be a great opportunity to encourage this.
Thoughts?
This more a guess than a thought:
The high volume of traffic on the path is a measure of its success.
Many of those enjoying that success are neighbors, including homeowners
along the path. My guess is that there's a lot less opposition from
homeowners now than there was before the path was built: This path is
one of the things that makes the neighborhoods that it passes through
attractive.
There's clearly a need for widening the path. That need is obvious to
anyone who uses it. I think there would be overwhelming support for
widening it.
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
