http://www.thechainlink.org/forum/topics/driver-s-license-required-to-ride-your-bike-upon-certain-roads-in
I thought this was an interesting post. The concept of permitted vs. Intended users of roadways is an important distinction even outside of it's legal implications. It goes to the heart of discussions about cyclists and stop signs, etc. I think bicycle advocacy 2.0 should move towards securing (and expecting) intentional cycling infrastructure. Without it, we'll always be 'permitted' (secondary) users of a motor vehicle infrastructure. It's a huge asset to have legal access to most roadways, but if cyclists are permitted rather than intended users, our safety and convenience will continue to take a back seat in someone's car. Grant
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
