Yes, 6:30 is correct!

You'd think after six years attending the meetings, I'd remember the time,
but I think I wiped it out and just wrote 6:00 PM.

Robbie Webber
Transportation Policy Analyst
State Smart Transportation Initiative
www.ssti.us
608-263-9984 (o)
608-225-0002 (c)
[email protected]


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:08 PM, India Viola <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Robbie,
>
> Thanks for all the good info regarding tomorrow eve's meeting.
> I just wanted to correct the time- it's listed as beginning at 6:30p.
> http://www.cityofmadison.com/council/
>
> And I've put a request in to the Bike Fed to keep us posted tomorrow about
> a cancellation/reschedule due to impending snowfall.
>
> -India
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Robbie Webber <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Short version: Tuesday, March 5, 6:00 PM, Madison Common Council will
>> vote on changes to North Sherman Ave. We need you there. If you can't make
>> it, or if Snowpocalypse makes travel impossible/dangerous, please send an
>> email to [email protected]
>>
>> These changes involve increased safety for ALL road users, and will
>> reduce speed, make crossing the street by foot safer and easier, and will
>> provide bicycle accommodations for the first time.
>>
>>
>> Longer version: Forwarded below by signature line is an email from Amanda
>> at the Bike Fed, but I want to add some points about this as well. I was
>> asked by someone for three reasons why this was a good idea. My response is
>> below.
>>
>> I appreciate you asking my opinion.
>>
>> 1. Today, we would never build a street such as Sherman - an arterial
>> with no bike lanes and with very poor accommodations for pedestrians (no
>> refuge islands, for instance.) The Madison Traffic Engineering Dept - not
>> the most radical bunch - considers it a "substandard street" because of the
>> lack of accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians.
>>
>> 2. The traffic engineers feel that the changes will actually make the
>> road safer for DRIVERS as well as walkers and bicyclists. The center turn
>> lane will reduce the conflict points for people turning left from seven
>> possible conflict points to two points. Left turns are especially
>> problematic on Sherman, accounting for a disproportionate percent of the
>> crashes.
>>
>> 3. The changes will likely slow traffic, though not as much as most
>> people think. Slower traffic will be safer for all users. Right now, the
>> 85th percentile - that is the speed at which 85 percent of people drive
>> that speed or slower - is far too high, more than 5 mph over the speed
>> limit.
>>
>> 4. There have not been many studies of 4-lane to 3-lane conversions and
>> their effect on economic activity, but the ones that have been done have
>> shown either no change or a POSITIVE effect on businesses.
>>
>> 5. Traffic Engineering feels that the new configuration can handle the
>> same volume of traffic. Four lanes undivided is fairly inefficient, because
>> a left-turning car will jam up one whole lane, and people will stack up
>> behind that car. The center turn lane removes the left-turning cars, and
>> the rest of the traffic can continue to move smoothly.
>>
>> 6. There are two schools on Sherman, and it is really unconscionable to
>> have an arterial road in front of a school without proper pedestrian
>> accommodations.
>>
>> Now, those are the reasons why this is a good configuration or change is
>> needed from what is there now. I'd also like to address some concerns that
>> have been raised as well. In some cases, there is no proof for what I am
>> about to say, though there have been plenty of studies indicating that I am
>> right in my assumptions.
>>
>> *Concerns voiced: *
>>
>> *Businesses will lose out because people will go another route.*
>> There may be some people that chose to drive on Packers instead of
>> Sherman. However, those people are likely through-traffic - going to Aberg,
>> Northport, or other routes out of town. Few of these people stop at
>> businesses now, and losing them to Packers is not going to affect the
>> businesses. However, the remaining traffic will be able to more easily turn
>> into the businesses when not stuck on a dysfunctional road. Drivers will be
>> going more slowly, so better able to SEE the businesses. In addition, the
>> area will benefit from more pedestrian and bicycle traffic - and you know
>> we do spend money.
>>
>> *There should be a different bike route.*
>> Granted, bike lanes on Sherman are not ideal for the "interested, but
>> concerned." But right now, it's the only route we have. All attempts to get
>> a route through on either the east or west side of Sherman have failed
>> because of one or more property owners not wanting to grant easements.
>> Besides, bicyclists need to go the same places that drivers do, and so we
>> need safe accommodations on Sherman even if there are other routes. That's
>> where the businesses are.
>>
>> *There aren't any bicyclists, so why are we building lanes for them.*
>> You and I know that bicyclists and pedestrians are often invisible to
>> people that are not looking for them. Bicyclists are already using Sherman,
>> but the majority of them are riding on the sidewalk, endangering
>> pedestrians and putting themselves at risk at each driveway. There is a
>> fairly large elderly population, and they have consistently complained to
>> the alder - Satya Rhodes-Conway, who works across the hall from me - about
>> bicyclist on the sidewalks. There are also the "strong and fearless" -
>> about 1% of bicyclists - that are taking the lane because they have no
>> other choice.
>>
>> *There just isn't space to add these features and still handle the
>> traffic, buses, etc. *
>> As I mentioned above, Traffic Engineering is not in the habit of
>> suggesting wild, traffic-clogging designs. They wouldn't go anywhere near
>> this if they thought that this wouldn't handle the traffic. They have been
>> advocating for this design for 20 years - long before anyone asked for bike
>> lanes. 20 years ago, it was about making it safer for drivers. Today it's
>> about making it safer for everyone.
>>
>> *No one wants this except those crazy bicyclists.*
>> People have been begging the alder for this change since she was elected
>> six years ago. The elderly population, parents of kids in school,
>> bicyclists, pedestrians, and all sorts of other residents have been asking
>> for this. When Sherman was repaved a couple years ago and the lanes
>> remained the same, people were furious with the city and with Satya for not
>> stripping bike lanes at that time.
>>
>> Finally, I'd like to make the argument that the current configuration of
>> Sherman is hurting the neighborhood in ways most people don't realize.
>>
>> I have three friends - two with children - that specifically did not
>> consider the neighborhoods off Sherman when they purchased a home because
>> of the lack of safe bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. The North
>> Transfer Point is right off Sherman, meaning there is excellent transit
>> service, except for one thing - it's really hard to cross the street.
>> Everyone who has to board on Sherman has to cross the street at least once
>> a day. People are terrified of this. Many people simply don't take the bus
>> because they don't find crossing Sherman safe or convenient. This hurts
>> property values, job choices, and businesses in the area. All those people
>> that think their business will decline don't realize all the people that
>> don't come because they feel they can't get there.
>>
>> A safer, slower North Sherman is going to benefit everyone and make the
>> neighborhood much more pleasant and marketable.
>>
>>
>>
>> Robbie Webber
>> Transportation Policy Analyst
>> State Smart Transportation Initiative
>> www.ssti.us
>> 608-263-9984 (o)
>> 608-225-0002 (c)
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Reminder - Action Alert!*
>>
>> *Stand up for a safer North Sherman Avenue tomorrow night*
>>
>> *We need YOUR HELP to make bike lanes and other improvements on North
>> Sherman a reality.* The Madison Common Council will vote TOMORROW NIGHT,
>> March 5th, on whether or not to make these changes. There has been vocal
>> opposition so attending the meeting and voicing support is incredibly
>> important.  Speaking at the meeting is very easy.  Simply complete the
>> brief registration form available when you arrive.  Include that you are
>> speaking in support of Agenda Item #27.  When the time comes, you'll be
>> called to come up and speak to the council for up to five minutes.  If you
>> can't attend tomorrow night's meeting, please email
>> [email protected] to lend your support.
>>
>>
>> Madison Common Council
>>
>> Tuesday, March 5th
>>
>> 6:30 pm
>>
>>
>> City County Building, Room 201 (210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd)
>>
>>
>> See more about the safety improvements below.
>>
>> We’re happy to announce that the City has a plan to slow down car traffic
>> and make bicycling and walking safer on North Sherman Ave. These
>> recommendations are the result of a long-term, community-driven effort to
>> improve conditions for bicyclists and pedestrians in the neighborhood.
>>
>> First, North Sherman Avenue will become a 3-lane street from Trailsway to
>> Fordem Avenue, consisting of a lane of traffic in each direction and a
>> two-way left turn lane in the center. This change will make room for bikes
>> lanes in addition to pedestrian refuge islands at five locations along the
>> project corridor. These changes will greatly improve conditions for the
>> countless pedestrians and bicyclists who live and travel in this area.
>> Currently, bicyclists and pedestrians have to share the sidewalk as there
>> is no safe place to travel by bike.
>>
>> You can find the Engineering report here:
>>
>>
>> http://madison.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=2307038&GUID=8CF94D09-4349-4B9E-AA4F-158FBD5E7577
>>
>> A big thank you to the City of Madison Traffic Engineering and
>> Engineering divisions and to Alder Satya Rhodes-Conway for making this
>> major safety improvement a possibility.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bikies mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> WeAreAllMechanics.com
> [email protected]
>
> Stay connected- Follow WAAM on 
> Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/We.Are.All.Mechanics>
>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to