I will say since the button-activated flashers have been there, I have seen 
about 99% compliance with cars stopping. Following the good general advice just 
listed, I feel it is a safe intersection, far safer than many crossings of 
University Avenue!
 
Dave


On Friday, July 11, 2014 5:19 PM, Larry D. Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
 

>
>
>I appreciate that all of the construction activity on the beltline Highway has 
>probably changed the ADT on County highway PD, and increased the number of 
>frazzled commuters, but the last time I looked at the traffic figures, PD was 
>comparable to the crossing at all Odana and Midvale Blvd.   Regardless, the 
>construction of a bridge at both locations will enhance the transportation 
>aspects of both these major bikeways.
>
>
>"If we build them they will come...."
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jul 11, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Mary Mullen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>Re: [Bikies] ambiguous intersections considered dangerous
>Good to hear.  I think it is a pipe dream that bicyclists using the Badger 
>State Trail would go out of their way by a quarter or half a mile or more to 
>cross PD on the soon-to-open new bridge by General Beverage and the landscape 
>company.  A previous respondent suggested that a separated grade crossing 
>would not be necessary once that bridge is open.   I definitely would not do 
>that unless my goal were unltimately to be on the Military Ridge Trail  even 
>though it might seem faster to do so when I'm waiting for rush hour traffic.
>
>
>On 7/11/14 10:15 AM, "Schaefer, William" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The City of Fitchburg applied for federal Transportation Alternatives 
>> Program 
>> funding for a grade-separated crossing at this intersection. The city is 
>> also 
>> planning to reconstruct this section of McKee Road (in conjunction with 
>> WisDOT 
>> work on the section further west as part of new Verona Rd interchange) and 
>> has 
>> applied for federal funds through the MPO for this project. The 
>> grade-separated crossing (probably a tunnel) would be done as part of the 
>> street project. It is scheduled for 2019.
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bikies [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William 
>> Hauda
>> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 10:02 AM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Bikies] ambiguous intersections considered dangerous
>> 
>> 
>>          I totally agree with you, Darin. This is a crossing crying for a 
>> safer solution. Your experience illustrates why.
>>          Greatest danger with flashing lights on a major four-lane road is 
>> when a car yields in the lane closest to the cyclist while a car in the 
>> adjacent lane (and out-of-sight of the cyclist) keeps going.
>>          The problem is especially severe during rush hour. McKee gets a 
>> huge 
>> volume of motor vehicle traffic at precisely the same time cyclists are 
>> commuting to and from work or getting out for recreation or a workout. I've 
>> repeatedly expressed my concerns to the powers that be that we need a bridge 
>> or tunnel instead, despite serious buried and aerial infrastructure issues 
>> that would need to be addressed. It would cost much more than simply putting 
>> up flashing lights, but the payback would, along with making everything more 
>> pleasant for both drivers and cyclists, include probably saving lives.
>>          Perhaps it's time to discuss this in detail and determine a course 
>> of 
>> action. McKee is slated for reconstruction and this would appear to be an 
>> appropriate time to include a safer crossing in the road plan. It will be on 
>> the August agenda for the board of directors of Friends of Badger Trail. My 
>> board's copied in. As are some of those powers that be.
>>          Bill Hauda, Fitchburg, president FOBT
>> 
>> At 09:23 AM 7/11/2014, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> Heading South on the Badger Trail, I approached the intersection with 
>>> CTH PD (Mckee Road) with my usual caution.  I don't use the meaningless 
>>> and ambiguous 'warning signal', because it is meaningless and 
>>> ambiguous.
>>> 
>>> One car on PD came to a stop, either because of the mistaken notion 
>>> that they are required to yield, or of the equally mistaken notion that 
>>> they are being 'nice'.  Usually I just wave them on, because it is an 
>>> ambiguous situation, and that makes me nervous. At a minimum I check to 
>>> see if there is traffic behind the stopped car.
>>> 
>>> My caution was warranted this time. Some dude-bro comes speeding along, 
>>> seemingly unaware of the car stopped in from of him. At the last 
>>> moment, he brakes hard, tires squealing, narrowly avoids rear-ending 
>>> that car,  and passes in the right lane; then takes off.
>>> Leaving the lovely smell of burnt rubber hanging in the air.
>>> 
>>> I suppose its possible that if I had activated the ambiguous warning 
>>> signal, it would have alerted the speeding dude-bro, but I kind of 
>>> doubt it.
>>> 
>>> My message to car drivers is pay attention, follow the rules of the 
>>> road, and don't try to be 'nice'.
>>> --
>>> darin burleigh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bikies mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bikies mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bikies mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> 
>_______________________________________________
>>Bikies mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bikies mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to