On Thursday 16 December 2004 03:53 pm, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >Sorry, my mistake. The "1300" mailbox has really more than 9000... > >So, could this be the problem? The partition is reiserfs and has more > >than 3G still free. > > The error is that Binc logs this as an error, possibly a crash. The code > shows me that Binc tries to lock the mailbox, but if the mailbox is > already locked, it logs this line, sleeps one second, then tries again > (possibly logging the same message again). > > So for multiaccessed mailboxes, it's very likely that this goes into your > logs. I'm going to flag this as a bug and have it fixed for the next > release of Binc. Until then, simply ignore this message in the logs. It's > most likely no crash at all, just two simultaneous clients trying to > access the same maildir.
just curious, but why is binc trying to lock the mailbox? isn't the maildir
format supposed to eliminate the need for locking?
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgps11RpWUY7k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
