Here's some info:
Opening INBOX with something like 1160 mails. Took about 20 seconds Opening INBOX/Otherfolder with something like 2466 mails. Took about 4 seconds The server was fully available to Binc. Are there any events that slow INBOX response (like recursive actions/events)? That's because opening other folders with more messages takes less time. Thank you, Ant�nio Fernandes Porto Management School -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Aardal Hanssen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2004 13:41 To: Binc IMAP General Subject: Re: [binc] BincImap On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Ant�nio Fernandes wrote: >Sorry... Wrong message to list :) >At least I didn't send this message to HeliosML.. >Question: I've set up BincImap (replacing Courier-IMAP) and I'm quite >concerned with performance issues. Binc has quite a big access time to >maildirs (particularly with intensive connect/disconnect programs like IMP). >Is there a way to measure performance with Binc? Some people have said that Binc's MIME parser outperforms the one in Courier-IMAP, but Binc certainly uses more memory. When it comes to hard numbers, I don't have any.. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
