-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Res wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > >> Well, a negligible number of people may have a very important position >> as like a businessman in international trade or a special researcher in >> scientific area. So i did not set a SPF record in DNS aside from the >> obvious things (e.g., mailing list manager's domain) ;; > > We have lawyers and doctors, and none of them have ever had any issues, > and I doubt an international business or scientific would be using > shared host server :)
That's local issue. It's hard to explain in detail. Anyway i would like to say that SPF is somewhat dangerous to use as anti-spam trick. Recently i'm going with DKIM [RFC4871] as an alternative technique to reduce spam and phishing. DKIM is more reasonable, smooth, exact than the others ;; byunghee -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkNq4YACgkQsCouaZaxlv43/gCgoQLZuvMv4Dd7jIDvTcxtnGQG MYwAoL9K46maKtrTzn9/nkGjbItI3ivJ =isdi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
