-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Res wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > >> to say that SPF is somewhat dangerous to use as anti-spam trick. > > I'd disagree, it helps reduce spam that is forged rmember whats SPFs > true purpose is, the fact it helps in spam reduction is a big plus.
Yep, i agree with spam reduction. However, i was telling you the method has a risk. You guy need to consider again why the SPF [RFC4408] remained as Experimental RFC instead of Standards Track at IETF. >> Recently i'm going with DKIM [RFC4871] as an alternative technique to >> reduce spam and phishing. DKIM is more reasonable, smooth, exact than > > DKIM is a joke, is it yahoo or gmail or maybe both? use that, and look > at all the spam that comes from them. Well, i believe that over the long term, DKIM is win. It means that peoples adopt reasonable things, at last ;; byunghee -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkPgFgACgkQsCouaZaxlv443ACgmSI1seQgc7Gckw24WSVqrsAp IakAn0UzEpFmOKAgRCta1jdim+F/cpzQ =AP+W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
