> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews<ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > RRsets are unordered. Software and configurations should > > be prepared for this. Where ordering is required it is > > built into the RR type. > > > > Mark
On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irvine wrote: > I've think I've found the confirmation I was looking for in RFC 2181 > section 10.2. > > Does this seem to confirm that round-robin PTR's are perfectly legal? yes, they are perfectly legal. However I don't know about any application that would require nor benefit of them, and I don't recommend using them. With most of applications doing reverse resolution and using its result anyhow it's still better to have always the same name... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar] _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
