On 7/8/2010 7:58 AM, John Horne wrote: >> You need to specify different "file" locations for each of the slaved >> zones (even if the data is the same) in each view. >> > Okay, but why? As said this generally works, it just seems a bit out of > step between the views.
Because BIND won't do what you are wanting it to unless you configure it this way .. (I don't mean to be trite, but I honestly can't tell you the technical reason -- I'm sure that one of the engineers will be more than willing to respond if you are looking for a strongly technical answer). > I say 'okay', but actually that means we are going to have to have twice > as many zone files as before (no problem), but we are also going to have > to almost double the configuration size if we have to individually > define each slave zone in both views. That's the cost of doing views. If you weren't defining each zone in each view, you weren't doing it right to begin with -- this complexity is one of the reasons that I strongly recommend AGAINST using views unless they are absolutely required and can't be worked around by changing your namespace in some way. AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
