> On 31/05/11 09:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> This problem could be avoided by providing the same data, but differently >> sorted, correct?
On 31.05.11 12:27, Phil Mayers wrote: > Not really. Client side sorting may take place (e.g. to comply with RFC > 3484 policies in calls to getaddrinfo) and destroy any server-side > sorting. by "this problem" I mean the DNSSEC. Providing all the data just differently sorted would cause them to be DNSSEC compliant, wouldn't it? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
