Hi--

On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:25 AM, John Miller wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a 
> similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
> 
> I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle DNS traffic.  
> So far, I've gotten it working using NAT (each rserver has a public and a 
> private IP) and using transparent load-balancing (ACE talks directly to the 
> public IP), aka direct server return.

IMO, the only boxes which should have IPs in both public and private netblocks 
should be your firewall/NAT routing boxes.

> Here's a question, however: how does one get probes working for a transparent 
> LB setup?  If an rserver listens for connections on all interfaces, then 
> probes work fine, but return traffic from the uses the machine's default IP 
> (not the VIP that was originally queried) for the source address of the 
> return traffic.

That's the default routing behavior for most platforms.  Some of them might 
support some form of policy-based routing via ipfw fwd / route-to or similar 
with other firewall mechanisms which would let the probes get returned from 
some other source address if you want them to do so.

> What have people done to get probes working with transparent LB?  Are any of 
> you using NAT to handle your dns traffic?  Not tying up NAT tables seems like 
> the way to go, but lack of probes is a deal-breaker on this end.

The locals around here have the luxury of a /8 netblock, so they can setup the 
reals behind a LB using publicly routable IPs and never need to NAT upon DNS 
traffic.  Folks with more limited # of routable IPs might well use LB to reals 
on an unrouteable private network range behind NAT, but in which case they 
wouldn't configure those boxes with public IPs.

Regards,
-- 
-Chuck

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to