Hi Mark, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 06:14 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > Did you try applying rpz2+rl-9.9.4-P1.patch to 9.9.4-P1?
No, not yet. Having had bad luck with applying the wrong version patch in the past, I've been waiting for an 'official' update. > Apart from the version file it should apply cleanly and > you can ignore the version file or patch it by hand if you > want. I would append "-rpz2+rl.13269.14" to "RELEASEVER=1" > to give "RELEASEVER=1-rpz2+rl.13269.14" which results in > a full version string of "9.9.4-P1-rpz2+rl.13269.14". Noted as an option. Thanks! Given that there's no response/info at all from that project either here, at their site, on their own mailing list, or via email, as much as it's useful/helpful functionality, I'm wondering whether it's wiser to just get rid of it from production. Adding supported 3rd-party functionality to Bind is enough of a hack for mere mortals -- adding unsupported/dead code sounds like a really bad idea. JenL _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
