In message <1385152907.15717.50929393.189b3...@webmail.messagingengine.com>, je n...@promessage.com writes: > Hi Mark, > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 06:14 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > Did you try applying rpz2+rl-9.9.4-P1.patch to 9.9.4-P1? > > No, not yet. Having had bad luck with applying the wrong version patch > in the past, I've been waiting for an 'official' update.
The -P's are minimal changes which just cover one or two issues unlike maintenance releases which can address a hundred issues. > > Apart from the version file it should apply cleanly and > > you can ignore the version file or patch it by hand if you > > want. I would append "-rpz2+rl.13269.14" to "RELEASEVER=1" > > to give "RELEASEVER=1-rpz2+rl.13269.14" which results in > > a full version string of "9.9.4-P1-rpz2+rl.13269.14". > > Noted as an option. Thanks! > > Given that there's no response/info at all from that project either > here, at their site, on their own mailing list, or via email, as much as > it's useful/helpful functionality, I'm wondering whether it's wiser to > just get rid of it from production. rpz2 code is itegrated into BIND 9.10. > Adding supported 3rd-party functionality to Bind is enough of a hack for > mere mortals -- adding unsupported/dead code sounds like a really bad > idea. It isn't dead. Generating a new patch just isn't a high priority item for Vernon. > JenL -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
