> IIRC there's no syntax/feature difference. Quickly attempting to use the existing, same named config that I've been using with 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14 with a new build of 9.9.4-P2 release, 9.9.4-P2 refuses to boot. I've not (yet) gotten any farther than that ...
... shouldn't be tough to figure out. but, SOMETHING is different/incompatible > ... performance enhancements ... right, which is why we 'all' switched in the 1st place > the lack of RPZ2 is keeping us on older bind 9.9 releases for the moment we'd done the same thru the entire 9.9.4-P1 cycle. with the P2 cycle, supported/up-to-date bind9 is more important to us. especially given the radio silence re: 3rd party patch dev. if/when rpz2 appears in bind9-releases, we'll (re)emjoy its benefits. ymmv. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
