2016-05-16 19:45 GMT+02:00 Alan Clegg <a...@clegg.com>: > On 5/16/16, 1:30 PM, "MegaBrutal" <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on > behalf of megabru...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>I want to have valid reverse & forward hostnames set up >>for this /64 subnet. > > This is silly. Don't do this.
Why? Most ISPs set up reverse & forward domain names for pool addresses. OK, I'm not an ISP, but it really seems to be a widely accepted and endorsed policy, to the point that addresses not having a reverse DNS often treated as suspicious. 2016-05-16 22:50 GMT+02:00 Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org>: > > If you want to delegate space to another server DELEGATE it. Add > NS records for the other server. Forward "zones" are NOT designed > to do this. Doing actual delegations is *not* hard and works with > every server in the world. What is the acceptable use case for forward zones, then? See, ideally the zone should be served by my BIND server, it should be authoritative for the zone. Why I can't use it as the authoritative server for the zone is that BIND does not have a feature that the other DNS server has (on-the-fly generation of IPv6 reverse & forward records, without the need to store 2 * 2 ^ 64 records in zone files). _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
