On 17 May 2016 at 09:29, Woodworth, John R <john.woodwo...@centurylink.com> wrote:
> > > > > >Ideally every machine should be registering its own PTR record in the > > > >DNS and addresses without machines shouldn't have PTR records. > > > >The only reason ISP did this is that they were too lazy to manage PTR > > > >records for their customers. > > > > > > And because no ISP wants "you.suck.isp.com" to show up in their DNS. > > > > > > Same fight, different address space. > > > > Agreed. Nice in theory, not going to happen in practice for the ISP > where I'm working. > > > Ditto here, great feature for smaller shop but not an ISP for a number of > reasons. > > I would also add based on business perspective sometimes "lazy" is > consumer or market > driven and can't be simply dismissed. How popular would a brand new 60" > television be > without a remote control? > > Indeed. When a business appears "too lazy" to do a thing you want them to do, what that really means is that there is no business case that makes it worth their while to spend the money on doing it.
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
