On 19.06.17 10:27, Mark Elkins wrote:
Another solution could be to make one of the names a CNAME pointing to
the other name.

No. This would create a real problem, since NS and mail have different AAAA


Just use one generic name for both services. rather than the two
"service" names.

impossible, since the info above (and in other threads - different servers.

Although in all honesty, I see nothing wrong with a lookup returning two
answers (in a single response packet)  for the one reverse query. BIND
certainly is not confused. I guess it confuses people?

apparently yes, because this thread exists.
There's OP confused about a problem that does not exists.

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
- Have you got anything without Spam in it?
- Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it.
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list

Reply via email to