On 19.06.17 10:27, Mark Elkins wrote:
Another solution could be to make one of the names a CNAME pointing to
the other name.


No. This would create a real problem, since NS and mail have different AAAA
records.

-or-

Just use one generic name for both services. rather than the two
"service" names.

impossible, since the info above (and in other threads - different servers.

Although in all honesty, I see nothing wrong with a lookup returning two
answers (in a single response packet)  for the one reverse query. BIND
certainly is not confused. I guess it confuses people?

apparently yes, because this thread exists.
There's OP confused about a problem that does not exists.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
- Have you got anything without Spam in it?
- Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to