MAYER Hans <hans.ma...@iiasa.ac.at> wrote:
>
> I also tried to define these records in my own RPZ and hoping it has
> higher priorities.

It should work if you put your passthru RPZ before any blocking RPZs.

A tangential aside...

The ordering in a response-policy section can affect performance, as well
as which policies take priority. I set `qname-wait-recurse no`, and I list
RPZs that do not require recursion (because they only contain `qname` and
`rpz-client-ip` triggers) before RPZs with unrestricted triggers.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Fitzroy: Easterly or northeasterly 4 or 5 in southeast, otherwise variable 3
or 4. Slight or moderate. Fair. Good.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to