On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert <xavier.humb...@ac-nancy-metz.fr> wrote: > > On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage. > > Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing and documentation," which seems to fit this use-case. 'invalid' doesn't seem to me to be intended for use as a generic private TLD though, as was suggested up-thread. However, if the OP is setting up a private network, with no Internet connection, for a demonstration, then any TLD at all could be used; a private root will be required regardless. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
