You need to be more specific with real examples. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 26. 10. 2022, at 17:41, Veronique Lefebure <veronique.lefeb...@cern.ch> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > dig answer is different between BIND 9.11 and BIND 9.16(.33) when +norecurse > option is used. > Is this documented somewhere ? > > Is there an option that needs to be set so that the behaviour of 9.16 is the > same as the one in 9.11. > > The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the > CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the > CNAME value and the IP of the CNAME. > > Thanks, > Veronique > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
