Hi all,
yes, here is a concrete example: # ip-dns-1 runs BIND 9.16.33: dig @ip-dns-1 spectrum.cern.ch +short +norecurse spectrum-lb.cern.ch. <------------- Here we get only the CNAME # ip-dns-0 runs BIND 9.11: dig @ip-dns-0 spectrum.cern.ch +short +norecurse spectrum-lb.cern.ch. xxx.xxx.xx.140 <-------- Here we get in addition the IP of spectrum-lb.cern.ch. And yes, a capture shows confirms indeed that dig returns less information when the BIND 9.16.33 DNS server is used. I guess you can easily reproduce that behaviour, unless it is due to a mis-configuration bit on our DNS server ? Thanks, Véronique > On 26/10/2022 21:04 Greg Choules <gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Veronique. > As other people have said, more details please. > > > To have a complete picture of what is going on, not only would we need to > know what your dig tests look like, but also where dig is sending its queries > and how that DNS server is configured. > > > You can tell dig to send queries anywhere, using @<server>. However, if you > don't use that it will default to using the nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf. > So it may be useful to see the contents of that. > > > Wherever dig is sending its queries, we would need to know what that server > will do with them. So its configuration would also be useful. > > > Lastly, the best way to see queries and responses, right down to the nuts and > bolts, is with a packet capture. > > > > > You thought this was an easy question, huh ;) > > Can you provide at least some of these things, to get started? > > > Cheers, Greg > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 16:41, Veronique Lefebure <veronique.lefeb...@cern.ch > <mailto:veronique.lefeb...@cern.ch>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > dig answer is different between BIND 9.11 and BIND 9.16(.33) when > > +norecurse option is used. > > Is this documented somewhere ? > > > > > > Is there an option that needs to be set so that the behaviour of 9.16 is > > the same as the one in 9.11. > > > > > > The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the > > CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the > > CNAME value and the IP of the CNAME. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Veronique -- > > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > > this list > > > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > > > > bind-users mailing list > > bind-users@lists.isc.org <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org> > > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users