i didn’t receive your reply but saw this on lists archive so replying to
you:
Do be aware that Ondrej is a member of ISC, the organization that
develops
BIND. He is also one of the maintainers of the Debian release of BIND
which
you are using.
Why should i be aware? Is he is a threat or something??
In general, claiming that everyone but you is wrong is not exactly a
teamplayer mentality, and creates aversion towards getting you the help
you're
asking for. Not just Ondrej or the other developers ISC employs, the
entire
list really.
I claim no such thing.
Or going even further than that, any list, any support channel. Not even
just
voluntary ones like this, even paid support channels aren't going to
like
customers who act like that. Those are paid to help you and to be nice
to you,
yes, but don't be surprised if it diminishes the quality of the help you
are
to receive.
I don’t share your views.
Do consider it, in any case.
I wont. from someone who cant even search the internet
N.B.: A trademark office allowed you to get a trademark on the term
"Intelligence"?
TM is not a LEGAL symbol. again learn to google and not hurl accusations
in public and make a fool of yourself.
On 21/04/2025 8:25 pm, akritrim® Intelligence™ via bind-users wrote:
version: BIND 9.20.8-1+0~20250416.117+debian12~1.gbp1ea9dd-Debian
(Stable Release) <id:> (<<REDACTED>>)
running on localhost: Linux x86_64 6.1.0-33-cloud-amd64 #1 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.133-1 (2025-04-10)
boot time: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:40:59 GMT
last configured: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:40:59 GMT
configuration file: /etc/bind/named.conf
CPUs found: 1
worker threads: 1
number of zones: 10 (0 automatic)
debug level: 0
xfers running: 0
xfers deferred: 0
xfers first refresh: 0
soa queries in progress: 0
query logging is ON
response logging is OFF
memory profiling is INACTIVE
recursive clients: 0/900/1000
recursive high-water: 0
tcp clients: 0/150
TCP high-water: 25
server is up and running
is this any way related to this?
From 9.20.8 release notes:
Restore NSEC3 closest-encloser lookup improvements.
A performance improvement for finding the closest encloser when
generating authoritative responses from NSEC3 zones was previously
reverted after a bug was found that could trigger an assertion failure.
([GL #4460], [GL #4950], and [GL #5108]) The bug has now been fixed,
and the performance improvement has been restored. [GL #5204]
On 21/04/2025 7:12 pm, Mark Andrews wrote:
What does ‘rndc status’ return?
On 21 Apr 2025, at 13:05, akritrim® Intelligence™ via bind-users
<bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
Thank you for your help. it does give insights into the problem.
if you check dnsviz history, this does not happen everytime.
the bind version is BIND
9.20.8-1+0~20250416.117+debian12~1.gbp1ea9dd-Debian
obtained from: https://www.isc.org/download/ —->
https://bind.debian.net/bind
there are no firewalls or load balancers. these are directly
connected to internet. i was running BIND 9.18 official debian
package and got no errors like this.
On 21/04/2025 4:46 am, Crist Clark wrote:
The version of BIND and where you got it would be a good start. Any
load
balancers, firewalls, etc. between the server and internet that
might touch
the DNS records?
True DNSSEC gurus please check my math.
DNSvis is correct. You're not sending the proper NSEC3 records. Like
the
RFC says, "It takes three to tango," or NSEC3 denial of existence.
You sent
two. For a name where two levels of label don't exists,
l5tz4.1i89a.akritrim.net
You should send back three NSEC3 records,
1) NSEC3 record that proves 1i89a.akritrim.net (
18QMAAOCT0HPNGCPD9MLONVAK13DS8HT) does not exist.
2) NSEC3 record for akritrim.net (N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P).
3) NSEC3 record proving the wildcard, *.akritrim.net (
6L23GRBE4JIMA1A0G8DSBBUT32V6VCO1), does not exist.
But you're not, you're only sending two,
N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 -
QDO3A5R9G64L616H1K2FF3SUMFPPRV3J A NS SOA MX TXT AAAA RRSIG DNSKEY
NSEC3PARAM CDS CDNSKEY CAA
67QJN06FLKRQCT38S4FF08EP31NDRL8S.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 -
6LPNNJIVL1267OV5QQSBFLMFIDHMHJ8P TXT RRSIG
Those are two I'd expect to see for (2) and (3), but where is (1)?
But it's weirder. For this name,
ebzoq.ik7ub.akritrim.net
You are sending three NSEC3, but one doesn't look like the right
one. You
should send,
1) NSEC3 record that proves 1i89a.akritrim.net (
S2NOKIAA732BLNNSEMCJ8KV74H6ICUEP) does not exist.
2) NSEC3 record for akritrim.net (N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P).
3) NSEC3 record proving the wildcard, *.akritrim.net (
6L23GRBE4JIMA1A0G8DSBBUT32V6VCO1), does not exist.
But these get sent,
N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 -
QDO3A5R9G64L616H1K2FF3SUMFPPRV3J A NS SOA MX TXT AAAA RRSIG DNSKEY
NSEC3PARAM CDS CDNSKEY CAA
I559SEFHCJO35HED2LU4N68B44CA281V.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 -
KOGD0HOUD9R7BAB4LKQR2E9ALI57C7N0 A AAAA RRSIG CAA
67QJN06FLKRQCT38S4FF08EP31NDRL8S.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 -
6LPNNJIVL1267OV5QQSBFLMFIDHMHJ8P TXT RRSIG
The first and last are the same two we got previously and line up
with (2)
and (3). But we get this other one that doesn't line up with (1).
But what
I /think/ that might be is the record that would prove
ebzoq.ik7ub.akritrim.net (IAT39F3MSSGS2D4O255VNHB67V2GCNVI) does not
exist
in its place.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:29 AM akritrim® Intelligence™ via
bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
i didn't specifically ask for your help. i don't know why you
replied. yes
i do need help but this doesn't mean i can read your mind.
so let me know what 'bits' of information should i share that will
meaningfully help me. ( this is equivalent to saying '
if you need anything specific let me know.')
today language models are more context aware.
and if you don't want to share what do you 'need' then leave it be,
i
don't want your help.
On April 20, 2025 5:17:46 PM UTC, "Ondřej Surý" <ond...@isc.org>
wrote:
>
>> On 20. 4. 2025, at 17:57, akritrim® Intelligence™ via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
>>
>> anyways, if you need anything specific let me know.
>
>Well, I don't really need anything, you've asked for help here, not I.
I've already told you what is needed,
>you didn't follow my advice :shrug:. The bits of information you have
provided are not sufficient to meaningfully
>help you.
>
>Ondrej
>--
>Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
>ond...@isc.org
>
>My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not
feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
>
>
akritrim® Intelligence™
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
akritrim® Intelligence™
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
unsubscribe from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
--
akritrim® Intelligence™
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
akritrim® Intelligence™
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
