As you describe this, this seems to be a change from the previously
documented (in R-exts) behaviour in R.  Let us review the "new"
documentation and then we probably need to take it up with R-devel, but
before doing so, experience suggests that doing our "homework" is
beneficial.  Is the package publicly available somewhere?  That may be
useful for other people.

Kasper


On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdia...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Suppose a package contains a vignette that is built quickly
> (small.Rnw) and another that takes a long time (big.Rnw).
> We want to provide both the source and the PDF for both, but on routine
> CMD build we only want to build the short one (the PDF for the long one
> having been pre-generated).
>
>
> This issue has come up before in this list and I think one suggested
> solution (see thread started by Kasper Daniel Hansen on 2012-06-12:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2012-June/003446.html) was
> to:
>
> - place small.Rnw (and small.bib) under /vignettes
> - place big.Rnw AND big.pdf under /inst/doc
>
> When we execute(d) (as BioC does)
>
> R CMD build --keep-empty-dirs --no-resave-data source
>
> the PDF for small would be created (and placed under /inst/doc in
> source.tar.gz) and big.* would also be placed under /inst/doc. This has
> worked just fine for me up to now.
>
>
> Now, however, with R-3.0.2 (downloaded this morning; svn rev 63937), the
> build does not place big.pdf under /inst/doc in the tar.gz. Thus,
> we get a warning when we run CMD check
>
>
> Package vignette without corresponding PDF/HTML:
>    ‘big.Rnw’
>
>
> What is the recommended way of dealing with this? Should this question be
> moved to R-devel (I asked here because an identical question was dealt
> with in this list).
>
> Best,
>
>
> R.
>
>
> --
> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
> Facultad de Medicina
> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
> 28029 Madrid
> Spain
>
> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
>
> Email: rdia...@gmail.com
>        ramon.d...@iib.uam.es
>
> http://ligarto.org/rdiaz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to