I would suggest the term "ExternalInterface" instead of "ThirdPartyClient".
Otherwise, looks great. Clearly there was a lot of thought and effort
invested.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Arora, Sonali <sar...@fhcrc.org> wrote:
> Re-attaching pdf document "suggestedbiocViews.pdf"
> Thanks and Regards
> Sonali.
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2014 12:31 PM, Arora, Sonali wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> We have been working to revise the biocViews.
>>
>> We are suggesting changes only to the software branch.
>>
>> Please see the attached document "suggestedbiocViews.pdf" for
>> the suggested changes.
>>
>> To see the suggested biocView tree structure , please look at:
>> system.file("inst","dot","biocViewsVocab.dot", package="biocViews")
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any suggestions about our "suggested"
>> biocViews.
>> We value your feedback and suggestions.
>>
>> ( You do NOT need to make changes to your existing packages in the
>> Bioconductor Repository - we will be doing that !- This email is sent out
>> only to get your suggestions/feedback and notify you of our on-going work)
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Sonali
>>
>>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sonali Arora
>
> Program in Computational Biology
> Division of Public Health Sciences
> Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
> 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
> P.O. Box 19024
> Seattle, WA 98109-1024
>
> E-mail: sar...@fhcrc.org
> Phone: (206) 667-4746
> Fax: (206) 667-4746
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
