Re: can of worms: yes it is

Re: don't want to open: well, it's either that or I personally cram some other 
peoples' packages through BioC approval so that my DMRcate and fixSeq mega 
patches can stick

So, it's a can of worms alright, and maybe the solution is to get more people 
to submit to their benevolent BioC overlords.  Because BioC is what CRAN and 
Python and various other competitors / rivals / alternatives could have been, 
if they'd been disciplined about it from the start.  BioC (and maybe 
glmnet/rsig) is the greatest achievement of R.  No sense letting that slip just 
because it's inconvenient.  Bring up the level of the 
github/rforge/googlecode/etc projects instead. 

I started this email agreeing with you but as I thought through it, I changed 
my mind. The great weakness of python (been using THAT lately) is that package 
documentation sucks. (Also it's crappy for manipulating BAMs). The BioC 
standards are IMHO the ultimate counterpoint to this, as is BiocParallel, the 
AMI, the google genomics R client... Why let something awesome like the BioC 
codebase slide downhill?  Make the other guys raise their standards instead. 
Over the long run, everybody wins (more citations, more users, higher quality 
code base, better reproducibility for science & industry)

Just mho.  My daughter woke up so I'm out of time to edit this monstrosity :-/

--t

> On Nov 8, 2014, at 8:01 AM, Vincent Carey <st...@channing.harvard.edu> wrote:
> 
> our guidelines state
> 
> Packages you depend on must be available via Bioconductor or CRAN; users
> and the automated build system have no way to install packages from other
> sources.
> 
> with increased utility of devtools/install_github perhaps we can relax this?
> 
> is it a can of worms we don't want to open?
> 
>    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to