Hi, I looked at https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/ after reading http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/04/15/048744 (Laurent Gatto is the 2nd author).
It got me thinking that maybe with the Bioconductor-mirror's at GitHub we could use Zenodo for creating DOI's of Bioconductor's packages for every Bioconductor release. So, for example when BioC 3.3 is release, have Bioconductor-mirror create a "release" (a git tag), which would then lead do a new DOI from Zenodo. It might have to be a bit more complicated. For example, maybe don't create a new DOI for a package if it had 0 commits during the last 6 month devel cycle. Also, I don't think that a new DOI should be created for every commit or package version bump since that would likely be a tad confusing. I also don't know if having DOIs for packages would increase citations to them or simply move them away from the papers (if a package has been described in a paper) to the Zenodo DOIs. That is, would someone cite the paper and the package DOI? Or just one of the two? Anyhow, it got me curious and would like to know what others think about it. Best, Leo Leonardo Collado Torres, PhD Candidate Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Website: http://lcolladotor.github.io/about.html _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel