That's correct. Dan
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrzej Oleś" <[email protected]> > To: "Robert M. Flight" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Marcin Kosiński" <[email protected]>, "bioc-devel" > <[email protected]>, "Dan Tenenbaum" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 8:15:36 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] downloads number status shields for packages > Hi Marcin, Robert, > > I think one problem with raw counts is that these reflect only downloads > from BioC servers and not from the mirrors - is that correct @Dan? > > Cheers, > Andrzej > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Robert M. Flight <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Those numbers are used to calculate the percentile download stat that is >> already on a given bioconductor package landing page. See >> http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/RTCGA.html >> >> I believe this was the way the Bioc admins went instead of just raw >> downloads. >> >> -Robert >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:58 AM Marcin Kosiński <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Have anyone considered creating shields (http://shields.io/) with the >> > status of total downloads number for packages held on bioc? This already >> > works for CRAN packages http://cranlogs.r-pkg.org/ >> > >> > It could take total `Nb of downloads` from the right table like here >> > http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/RTCGA.html >> > >> > Best, >> > Marcin >> > >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > [email protected] mailing list >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
