Dear Sokratis
What do you get when you run the package vignette on a current R-devel
on your own machine?
Even if your code didn't change, that of R, or of packages your package
depends on, will have changed and may challenge assumptions that you
make in your code.
best wishes
Wolfgang
17.5.17 15:39, Sokratis Kariotis scripsit:
Hey all,
I maintain 'pathprint', a package added to bioconductor in the last
release. Now the BioC 3.6 BUILD (
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.6/bioc-LATEST/pathprint/)
<http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.6/bioc-LATEST/pathprint/> is
producing an error in all 3 platforms (despite it used to be error-free and
there were no changes to the code after that). *malbec1* and *tokay1* share
the same error:
Error: processing vignette 'exampleFingerprint.Rnw' failed with diagnostics:
invalid PDF version
Execution halted
while *veracruz1* provides a different error
Error: processing vignette 'exampleFingerprint.Rnw' failed with diagnostics:
chunk 2 (label = data)
Error in array(x, c(length(x), 1L), if (!is.null(names(x))) list(names(x), :
'data' must be of a vector type, was 'NULL'
Execution halted
The two errors seem to be different, the first one appears at the very
beginning and is general,
while the second one is having a problem with the data chuck of the file.
Could any changes in BioC 3.6 be responsible, since the code didnt
change at all? Thanks in advance for any help!
Regards,
Sokratis
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
--
With thanks in advance-
Wolfgang
-------
Wolfgang Huber
Principal Investigator, EMBL Senior Scientist
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
Heidelberg, Germany
wolfgang.hu...@embl.de
http://www.huber.embl.de
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
