Model results could be stored in another SE. The contrasts are treated as samples, and stuff like p-values, effect sizes, etc as assays. Question is whether those should just be tacked onto a MAE, or kept as separate objects, or stored along with the MAE in a larger analysis-level workflow object.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen < kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think analysis of multiassay experiments often will consists of > integration following assay-specific models. Not necessarily, but it will > be a usecase. Organizing multiple model fits together could be useful, for > downstream comparison / integration. > > Say you find DMRs and DE genes. Now you want to do something with them. > Right now we have multiple objects floating around. Would it be useful to > have a collector for this? > > Best, > Kasper > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Levi Waldron <lwaldron.resea...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen < > > kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Are you discussing statistics of the same dimension as the data > (unusual) > >> or summary statistics? We should think about a MAE version of summary > >> statistics, but that is not captured in current representation I would > >> say. > >> > > > > What do you have in mind Kasper? I assumed that summary statistics could > > usually be kept in the rowData of a SummarizedExperiment. > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
