Dear James,

I should have mentioned that email... I had seen it. But I mostly read it
as personal experience. However, given that you refer me to that, I will
assume my proposal is acceptable, as it is comparable to Martin's write up.

Thanks,

Egon


On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:06 PM, James W. MacDonald <jmac...@uw.edu> wrote:

> This was recently discussed:
>
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2018-February/012875.html
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Egon Willighagen <
> egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> after doing a bit of work on the BridgeDbR package this weekend, I was
>> wondering exactly the same thing. I prefer small patches, so that I can
>> easily link the change with the commit message and have related changes
>> together (and fairly, it allows me to see when I actually work on what
>> (#academicTimeReporting)... But previously I learned that when you push
>> something to the repository, you should bump the question, so currently I
>> do this for every change I made, leaving a ridiculous number of minor
>> release and really short NEWS entries...
>>
>> Working in a branch and when only bumping the version number just before
>> the merge into master makes a lot of sense to me.
>>
>> Can some senior developer and/or gatekeeper confirm that that is
>> acceptable
>> commit practice?
>>
>> Egon
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Nicolas Descostes <
>> nicolas.descos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >  Dear Bioconductor community,
>> >
>> > When developing further a package, is the best practice to create a
>> branch
>> > and bump the version when a full new feature is merged or to stay on the
>> > master without bumping when committing temporarily? More generally,
>> When do
>> > you usually bump a version?
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Nicolas
>> >
>> >         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E.L. Willighagen
>> Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
>> Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
>> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
>> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
>> PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
>> ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
>> ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
>>
>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> James W. MacDonald, M.S.
> Biostatistician
> University of Washington
> Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
> 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4225+Roosevelt+Way+NE,+%23+100+Seattle+WA+98105&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Seattle WA 98105
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4225+Roosevelt+Way+NE,+%23+100+Seattle+WA+98105&entry=gmail&source=g>-6099
>
>



-- 
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to