I'd suggest separating the operations on the data from the interface.
You can have both, one layer for programming and another for
interactive analysis.

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:05 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
<aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> In the end I endeavour to end up with a handful of verbs, with which I can do 
> all tasks in a project.
>
> Regarding the BED files: they're basic bed files, with additional metadata 
> columns to allow traceback. But for the purpose of multicrispr, non need to 
> restrict to those files only. You extraCols works great for me. And for 
> multicrispr examples, I have removed the metadata cols to keep things simple. 
> You were right btw that things went wrong earlier in the column stripping 
> process.
>
> Aditya
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Bhagwat, 
> Aditya [aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:57 PM
> To: Michael Lawrence
> Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> That's a software design dilemma I've encountered a few times.
>
> One approach is to keep the "verb" functions bare. E.g. read_bed would only 
> read a bedfile, and plot_bed would somehow plot it. Advantage: if read_bed 
> doesn't depend on anything else, other functions can depend on it, which 
> makes dependency handling easier.
>
> Another intention is to make verb functions "intuitive". In that scenario, I 
> try for each operation to also output a visual image of the operation, to 
> make it easier to see at a glance what is happening. E.g. for the range 
> operations in multicrispr, the function plot_intervals visually shows what 
> operation is being performed, making it easier to both spot errors as well as 
> maintain focus.
>
> In the case of read_bed, I thought of wrapping around your excellent 
> core-level rtracklayer::import(), additionally providing the textual and 
> visual feedback which I intent to give.
>
> Interesting to hear your suggestions on this topic, though.
>
> Aditya
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:33 PM
> To: Bhagwat, Aditya
> Cc: Michael Lawrence; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
>
> I'm not sure if a function called read_bed() should be plotting or
> printing. Is your BED file a known BED variant, i.e., maybe there is a
> better name for the file type than "bed"?
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
> <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
> >
> > Actually,
> >
> > I will keep multicrispr::read_bed(), but wrap it around 
> > rtracklayer::import.bed, and additionally plot and print range summaries.
> >
> > Aditya
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Bhagwat, 
> > Aditya [aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 11:31 AM
> > To: Michael Lawrence
> > Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> >
> > (Typo corrected to avoid confusion)
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > rtracklayer::import.bed() indeed works perfectly for me, so I am dropping 
> > multicrispr::read_bed().
> >
> > In order to avoid the overkill of `require(tracklayer)` for multicrispr 
> > <https://gitlab.gwdg.de/loosolab/software/multicrispr> users, does it make 
> > sense to import/re-export import.bed() in multicrispr? What is BioC 
> > convention/best practice in such cases?
> >
> > Aditya
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Bhagwat, 
> > Aditya [aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 8:35 AM
> > To: Michael Lawrence
> > Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> >
> > Thank you Michael :-)
> >
> > Aditya
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 8:49 PM
> > To: Bhagwat, Aditya
> > Cc: Michael Lawrence; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> >
> > I think you probably made a mistake when dropping the columns. When I
> > provide the extraCols= argument (inventing my own names for things),
> > it almost works, but it breaks due to NAs in the extra columns. The
> > "." character is the standard way to express NA in BED files. I've
> > added support for extra na.strings to version 1.45.6.
> >
> > For reference, the call is like:
> >
> > import("SRF.bed", extraCols=c(chr2="character", start2="integer",
> > end2="integer", mDux="factor", type="factor", pos1="integer",
> > pos2="integer", strand2="factor", from="factor", n="integer",
> > code="character", anno="factor", id="character", biotype="character",
> > score2="numeric" ), na.strings="NA")
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:23 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
> > <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > I removed the additional metadata columns in SRF.bed
> > > https://gitlab.gwdg.de/loosolab/software/multicrispr/blob/master/inst/extdata/SRF.bed
> > >
> > > But still can't get rtracklayer::import.bed working:
> > >
> > > > rtracklayer::import.bed(bedfile)
> > > Error in scan(file = file, what = what, sep = sep, quote = quote, dec = 
> > > dec, : scan() expected 'a real', got '1.168.595'
> > > > bedfile
> > > [1] 
> > > "C:/Users/abhagwa/Documents/R/R-3.6.1/library/multicrispr/extdata/SRF.bed"
> > >
> > > Never mind, multicrispr function read_bed, based on data.table::fread is 
> > > doing the job, so I will stick to that .
> > >
> > > Thank you for all feedback,
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Aditya
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Bhagwat, 
> > > Aditya [aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 2:48 PM
> > > To: Michael Lawrence
> > > Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> > >
> > > Oh :-) - Thankyou for explaining!
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 2:40 PM
> > > To: Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > Cc: Michael Lawrence; Shepherd, Lori; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> > >
> > > Having a "." in the function name does not make something "S3".
> > > There's no dispatch from import() to import.bed(). Had I not been a
> > > total newb when I created rtracklayer, I would have called the
> > > function importBed() or something like that. Sorry for the confusion.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh, superb, thx!
> > > >
> > > > Interesting ... here you use S3 rather than S4 - I wonder the design 
> > > > intention underlying these choices (I'm asking because I am trying to 
> > > > figure out myself when to use S3 and when to use S4 and whether to mix 
> > > > the two).
> > > >
> > > > Aditya
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 2:23 PM
> > > > To: Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > > Cc: Michael Lawrence; Shepherd, Lori; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> > > >
> > > > The generic documentation does not mention it, but see ?import.bed.
> > > > It's similar to colClasses on read.table().
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:15 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > > <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thankyou Michael,
> > > > >
> > > > > How do I use the extraCols argument? The documentation does not 
> > > > > mention an `extraCols` argument explicitly, so it must be one of the 
> > > > > ellipsis arguments, but `?rtracklayer::import` does not mention it. 
> > > > > Should I say extraCols = 10 (ten extra columns) or so?
> > > > >
> > > > > Aditya
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 2:05 PM
> > > > > To: Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > > > Cc: Michael Lawrence; Shepherd, Lori; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> > > > >
> > > > > It breaks it because it's not standard BED; however, using the
> > > > > extraCols= argument should work in this case. Requiring an explicit
> > > > > format specification is intentional, because it provides validation
> > > > > and type safety, and it communicates the format to a future reader.
> > > > > This also looks a bit like a bedPE file, so you might consider using
> > > > > the Pairs data structure.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:51 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > > > <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Michael,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, I also noticed that the attachment was eaten when it entered 
> > > > > > the bio-devel list.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The file is also accessible in the extdata of the multicrispr:
> > > > > > https://gitlab.gwdg.de/loosolab/software/multicrispr/blob/master/inst/extdata/SRF.bed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A bedfile to GRanges importer requires columns 1 (chrom), 2 
> > > > > > (chromStart), 3 (chromEnd), and column 6 (strand). All of these are 
> > > > > > present in SRF.bed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am curious as to why you feel that having additional columns in a 
> > > > > > bedfile would break it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aditya
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > > From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:41 PM
> > > > > > To: Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > > > > Cc: Shepherd, Lori; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't see an attachment, nor can I find the multicrispr package
> > > > > > anywhere. The "addressed soon" was referring to the BEDX+Y formats,
> > > > > > which was addressed many years ago, so I've updated the 
> > > > > > documentation.
> > > > > > Broken BED files will never be supported.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:17 AM Bhagwat, Aditya
> > > > > > <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Lori,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I remember now - I tried this function earlier, but it does not 
> > > > > > > work for my bedfiles, like the one in attach.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > bedfile <- system.file('extdata/SRF.bed', package = 
> > > > > > > > 'multicrispr')
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > targetranges <- rtracklayer::import(bedfile, format = 'BED', 
> > > > > > > > genome = 'mm10')
> > > > > > > Error in scan(file = file, what = what, sep = sep, quote = quote, 
> > > > > > > dec = dec, : scan() expected 'an integer', got 'chr2'
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perhaps this sentence in `?rtracklayer::import` points to the 
> > > > > > > source of the error?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > many tools and organizations have extended BED with additional 
> > > > > > > columns. These are not officially valid BED files, and as such 
> > > > > > > rtracklayer does not yet support them (this will be addressed 
> > > > > > > soon).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Which brings the question: how soon is soon :-D ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Aditya
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > From: Shepherd, Lori [lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org]
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:02 PM
> > > > > > > To: Bhagwat, Aditya; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: read_bed()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please look at rtracklayer::import() function that we recommend 
> > > > > > > for reading of BAM files along with other common formats.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Lori Shepherd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bioconductor Core Team
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Roswell Park Cancer Institute
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Elm & Carlton Streets
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Buffalo, New York 14263
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of 
> > > > > > > Bhagwat, Aditya <aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 6:58 AM
> > > > > > > To: bioc-devel@r-project.org <bioc-devel@r-project.org>
> > > > > > > Subject: [Bioc-devel] read_bed()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear bioc-devel,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I had two feedback requests regarding the function read_bed().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) Did I overlook, and therefore, re-invent existing 
> > > > > > > functionality?
> > > > > > > 2) If not, would `read_bed` be suited for existence in a more 
> > > > > > > foundational package, e.g. `GenomicRanges`, given the rather 
> > > > > > > basal nature of this functionality?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It reads a bedfile into a GRanges, converts the coordinates from 
> > > > > > > 0-based (bedfile) to 1-based 
> > > > > > > (GRanges)<https://www.biostars.org/p/84686>, adds BSgenome info 
> > > > > > > (to allow for implicit range validity 
> > > > > > > checking<https://support.bioconductor.org/p/124250>) and plots 
> > > > > > > the karyogram<https://support.bioconductor.org/p/124328>.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for your feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Aditya
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #' Read bedfile into GRanges
> > > > > > > #'
> > > > > > > #' @param bedfile file path
> > > > > > > #' @param bsgenome BSgenome, e.g. 
> > > > > > > BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10::Mmusculus
> > > > > > > #' @param zero_based logical(1): whether bedfile GRanges are 
> > > > > > > 0-based
> > > > > > > #' @param rm_duplicates logical(1)
> > > > > > > #' @param plot logical(1)
> > > > > > > #' @param verbose logical(1)
> > > > > > > #' @return \code{\link[GenomicRanges]{GRanges-class}}
> > > > > > > #' @note By convention BED files are 0-based. GRanges are always 
> > > > > > > 1-based.
> > > > > > > #' A good discussion on these two alternative codings is given
> > > > > > > #' by Obi Griffith on Biostars: https://www.biostars.org/p/84686/
> > > > > > > #' @examples
> > > > > > > #' bedfile <- system.file('extdata/SRF.bed', package = 
> > > > > > > 'multicrispr')
> > > > > > > #' bsgenome <- BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10::Mmusculus
> > > > > > > #' (gr <- read_bed(bedfile, bsgenome))
> > > > > > > #' @importFrom data.table :=
> > > > > > > #' @export
> > > > > > > read_bed <- function(
> > > > > > > bedfile,
> > > > > > > bsgenome,
> > > > > > > zero_based = TRUE,
> > > > > > > rm_duplicates = TRUE,
> > > > > > > plot = TRUE,
> > > > > > > verbose = TRUE
> > > > > > > ){
> > > > > > > # Assert
> > > > > > > assert_all_are_existing_files(bedfile)
> > > > > > > assert_is_a_bool(verbose)
> > > > > > > assert_is_a_bool(rm_duplicates)
> > > > > > > assert_is_a_bool(zero_based)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # Comply
> > > > > > > seqnames <- start <- end <- strand <- .N <- gap <- width <- NULL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # Read
> > > > > > > if (verbose) cmessage('\tRead %s', bedfile)
> > > > > > > dt <- data.table::fread(bedfile, select = c(seq_len(3), 6),
> > > > > > > col.names = c('seqnames', 'start', 'end', 'strand'))
> > > > > > > data.table::setorderv(dt, c('seqnames', 'start', 'end', 'strand'))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # Transform coordinates: 0-based -> 1-based
> > > > > > > if (zero_based){
> > > > > > > if (verbose) cmessage('\t\tConvert 0 -> 1-based')
> > > > > > > dt[, start := start + 1]
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if (verbose) cmessage('\t\tRanges: %d ranges on %d chromosomes',
> > > > > > > nrow(dt), length(unique(dt$seqnames)))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # Drop duplicates
> > > > > > > if (rm_duplicates){
> > > > > > > is_duplicated <- cduplicated(dt)
> > > > > > > if (any(is_duplicated)){
> > > > > > > if (verbose) cmessage('\t\t %d after removing duplicates')
> > > > > > > dt %<>% extract(!duplicated)
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # Turn into GRanges
> > > > > > > gr <- add_seqinfo(as(dt, 'GRanges'), bsgenome)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # Plot and return
> > > > > > > title <- paste0(providerVersion(bsgenome), ': ', 
> > > > > > > basename(bedfile))
> > > > > > > if (plot) plot_karyogram(gr, title)
> > > > > > > gr
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > > > > > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This email message may contain legally privileged and/or 
> > > > > > > confidential information. If you are not the intended 
> > > > > > > recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the 
> > > > > > > delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
> > > > > > > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
> > > > > > > use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received 
> > > > > > > this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> > > > > > > e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank 
> > > > > > > you.
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > > > > > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Michael Lawrence
> > > > > > Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
> > > > > > Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
> > > > > > Office +1 (650) 225-7760
> > > > > > micha...@gene.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | 
> > > > > > YouTube
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Michael Lawrence
> > > > > Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
> > > > > Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
> > > > > Office +1 (650) 225-7760
> > > > > micha...@gene.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michael Lawrence
> > > > Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
> > > > Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
> > > > Office +1 (650) 225-7760
> > > > micha...@gene.com
> > > >
> > > > Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Lawrence
> > > Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
> > > Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
> > > Office +1 (650) 225-7760
> > > micha...@gene.com
> > >
> > > Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Lawrence
> > Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
> > Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
> > Office +1 (650) 225-7760
> > micha...@gene.com
> >
> > Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >
> >         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Lawrence
> Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
> Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
> Office +1 (650) 225-7760
> micha...@gene.com
>
> Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel



-- 
Michael Lawrence
Scientist, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
Office +1 (650) 225-7760
micha...@gene.com

Join Genentech on LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to