I don't have that information. If the package is not on GitHub then maybe send an email to its maintainers.

Best,
H.

On 19/08/2021 17:55, Ruijia Wang wrote:
Hi Hervé,

Can share with me the issue page of Rsubread? It seems listed neither on the Bioconductor page nor on Github. Thanks.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:36 AM Hervé Pagès <hpages.on.git...@gmail.com <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    There's been no activity on Rsubread since Aug 8. You might want to
    open
    an issue on GitHub. It might help.

    H.

    On 17/08/2021 16:26, Ruijia Wang wrote:
     > Thanks so much for your explanation!
     > I will probably wait for the newer version of Rsubreads to fix it.
     >
     > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 9:16 PM Hervé Pagès
    <hpages.on.git...@gmail.com <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com>
     > <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com
    <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
     >
     >     Hi Ruijia,
     >
     >     I think this is due to recent changes to Rsubread. You can
    actually see
     >     the same error here for Rsubread:
     >
     >
     >
    
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Rsubread/nebbiolo2-buildsrc.html
    
<http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Rsubread/nebbiolo2-buildsrc.html>
>  <http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Rsubread/nebbiolo2-buildsrc.html <http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Rsubread/nebbiolo2-buildsrc.html>>
     >
     >     These recent changes to Rsubread did not propagate yet which
    makes
     >     things a little hard to reproduce i.e. you can't just use
     >     BiocManager::install() to get the latest Rsubread. Instead
    you need to
     >     install it directly from git.bioconductor.org
    <http://git.bioconductor.org>
     >     <http://git.bioconductor.org <http://git.bioconductor.org>>
     >     (https://git.bioconductor.org/packages/Rsubread
    <https://git.bioconductor.org/packages/Rsubread>
     >     <https://git.bioconductor.org/packages/Rsubread
    <https://git.bioconductor.org/packages/Rsubread>>). This is what the
     >     build
     >     system does.
     >
     >     FWIW the reasons the latest changes to Rsubread didn't
    propagate yet is
     >     because the package fails to pass 'R CMD build' and also
    because the
     >     changes have not been followed by a version bump. Last
    version bump was
     >     on July 6 from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3.
     >
     >     Cheers,
     >     H.
     >
     >
     >     On 15/08/2021 17:24, Ruijia Wang wrote:
     >      > Hi BioC-devel,
     >      >
     >      > I am the author of the Bioconductor package APAlyzer (
     >      >
    https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/APAlyzer.html
    <https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/APAlyzer.html>
>  <https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/APAlyzer.html <https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/APAlyzer.html>>). I
     >      > current noticed there is an ERROR in the building report
    of our
     >     latest dev
     >      > version  (1.7.3) on the page of Bioconductor (
     >      >
     >
    
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/APAlyzer/nebbiolo2-checksrc.html
    
<http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/APAlyzer/nebbiolo2-checksrc.html>
>  <http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/APAlyzer/nebbiolo2-checksrc.html <http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/APAlyzer/nebbiolo2-checksrc.html>>
     >      > ).
     >      >
     >      >>
     >      >> * Error: object 'fout_annot' not found** Backtrace:*
     >      >>
     >      >> * 1. └─APAlyzer::PASEXP_IPA(...) test_IPA_analysis.R:10:8*
     >      >> * 2. └─Rsubread::featureCounts(...)** 3.
     >     └─base::file.remove(fout_annot)*
     >      >
     >      >
     >      > However, I can not repeat this error using R 4.1 and
    Bioconductor
     >     3.14 on
     >      > my end with either *R CMD check* or
     >     *BiocCheck("APAlyzer_1.7.3.tar.gz").* And
     >      > I don't recall any of the code updating would trigger the
    error of
     >      > *base::file.remove()*. Could you help me to figure out how to
     >     fix/bypass
     >      > this issue in the building report of Bioconductor? Thanks
    in advance!
     >      >
     >      > Best,
     >      > Ruijia
     >      >
     >      >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
     >      >
     >      > _______________________________________________
     >      > Bioc-devel@r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel@r-project.org>
    <mailto:Bioc-devel@r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
     >     mailing list
     >      > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
    <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel>
     >     <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
    <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel>>
     >      >
     >
     >     --
     >     Hervé Pagès
     >
     >     Bioconductor Core Team
     > hpages.on.git...@gmail.com <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com>
    <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com>>
     >

-- Hervé Pagès

    Bioconductor Core Team
    hpages.on.git...@gmail.com <mailto:hpages.on.git...@gmail.com>


--
Hervé Pagès

Bioconductor Core Team
hpages.on.git...@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to