Hi, Ketil has to decide if something is his code.
Generally, on hackage, I often see current and past authors in the 'author' field, while only the current author or maintainer is named as 'maintainer'. Sometimes the maintainer is not an author, if he simply manages the code. Gruss, Christian PS: you need to remove the haskell98 dependency, just keep base. Or make a more detailed if-then-else based on ghc in use. (different versions of ghc trapped me there, too) * Dan Fornika <dforn...@gmail.com> [19.06.2012 02:01]: > Hi biohaskellers, > > I've split off a few small libraries from the old bio library. > They're up on hackage here: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bioace > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bioalign > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/biophd > > They're all involved one way or another in working with sanger data > for those of us that still have old phred/phrap/consed datasets > kicking around. > > For the most part, I've just swapped out the old data types for the > ones defined in biocore. I did add a bit of functionality to biophd > for reading 'tags' that are appended to the ends of phd files by > consed. I'd like to re-factor a bit to make the code a bit more > streamlined, but I first just wanted to get it compiled and working. > > I'd like to make sure I'm giving credit where it's due. Should I > change the author field in the .cabal file to Ketil, who designed > and wrote the original biolib code? Should I just include an > attribution comment at the top of the source file? Should I just > send the codebase for all three libraries back over to Ketil to > manage? > > Let me know, I want to be a good open-source citizen ;) > > Dan > _______________________________________________ > Biohaskell mailing list > Biohaskell@biohaskell.org > http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
pgpy253P4rzhO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Biohaskell mailing list Biohaskell@biohaskell.org http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
