Hi 
Perhaps something usefull here as well...
http://industry.ebi.ac.uk/candy/

Matthew Pocock wrote:
> 
> Propose away - do we have ontologies for these things knocking about yet?
> 
> Cox, Greg wrote:
> 
> > I apologize for the cross-posting.
> >
> > I'm involved in the BioJava project, and I'm looking at constructing a
> > uniform vocabulary for the parsed keys.  For example, currently in BioJava,
> > if an EMBL record is parsed the Organism information goes under the key
> > 'OS', while if a Genbank record is parsed, the information is under the key
> > "ORGANISM".  Are there existing standards that define the keys used, or
> > should I put together a new proposal?
> >
> > Greg Cox
> > _______________________________________________
> > BioXML-dev mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://bioxml.org/mailman/listinfo/bioxml-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l

-- 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |Juha Muilu, Ph.D., EMBL Outstation| Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]         |
 |European Bioinformatics Institute | Phone:  +44 (0)1223 494 624     |
 |Wellcome Trust Genome Campus      | Fax:    +44 (0)1223 494 468     |
 |Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK   | http://industry.ebi.ac.uk/~muilu|
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l

Reply via email to