I'd like to chime in and say that I'm not crazy about the approach
either. Static methods on singletons that behave as factories is one
thing but in an implementation class I feel that the contstructor (or a
seperate initializer method in complex cases like this one) are a better
choice.
We get alot of cool stuff from BioJava so its not a major issue but I
did want to weigh in with my opinion.
Mike
Thomas Down wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:43:58AM +0100, Keith James wrote:
>
>>Err, there was... EMBL & Genbank parsing are temporarily broken and
>>Biojava won't build for me. I'm fixing it at the moment. It shouldn't
>>take long.
>>
>>Is this a problem with Ant? I had to do an 'ant clean' before the
>>problem became apparent.
>>
>
>Oookay, I thought I did an `ant clean' last night. But
>evidently not. It was late.
>
>Are you alright fixing this?
>
>Anyone know of any ways to do dependancy-based builds in
>java which don't rely on the classic compiler (which never
>worked reliably for me anyway...)?
>
>Sorry,
>
> Thomas.
>_______________________________________________
>Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
