I don't think it does. The lgpl specifies that the code is owned by the developers (the developer effectively being Cambridge Antibody Technology in this case) although it is still released under the lgpl.
As for point 2, that's not really upto me :-) Mark -----Original Message----- From: Emig, Robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 2:40 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Biojava-l] Copyright notices Copyright (c) 2000,2001 Cambridge Antibody Technology. All Rights Reserved I noticed that many files contain the above copyright notice. 1) Does this conflict at all with the files being under lgpl 2) regardless can we remove them? and put the lgpl notice? -Robin _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
