No I'm not using it. I just thought it was more understandable than the alternative.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Down [mailto:td2@;sanger.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, 1 November 2002 1:30 p.m. > To: Schreiber, Mark > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] FeatureFilter.AndNot > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 09:21:44AM +1300, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > > Hi - > > > > I actually quite like the semantics, it may not be terse > but it's much > > easier to read and figure out what is going on. > > > > If we have to delete it I would favour deprecating it for a while, > > especially if it actually works. > > It doesn't really work -- or at least, it's not properly > recognized by FilterUtils.areProperSubset and > FilterUtils.areDisjoint. This is fixable. Just seemed nicer > to delete the whole thing and forget about it if nobody was > actually using it. > > If you ARE using it, I'm quite happy to keep it. > > Thomas. > ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
