On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > Running on a remote machine (ie where the service is located by > something like JNDI) might be best left to something like J2EE message > driven beans or something similar. For good old biojava we should > probably focus (at first) on local. After all once the local running > service is working it can be made available in a client that is > registered on JNDI, the client could be local or remote. Getting serious > JNDI dependencies in biojava might be a bit heacy (at least for 1.4).
There is talk of creating a standalone JNDI implementation from pulling out the one in Tomcat on the Jakarta Commons mailing list. michael _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
