Fair enough. Well, in that case it sounds like a potential improvement case for BioJavaX (at the time I wrote the BioSQL mappers I'm sure there was no way of mapping them else I would have implemented it... but I might have been wrong).
First thing to do is to raise the appropriate bug in BugZilla. Bandaru - could you do that? (That way you will 'own' the bug and will be notified when people are working on it / have fixed it.) Then, as to who fixes it... volunteers, please! I do make infrequent trawls through BugZilla, but I rarely have the time to fix any of them. :( cheers, Richard Hilmar Lapp wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Richard Holland wrote: > >> Whilst BioJava supports the < and > annotation, and will correctly load >> these from the file and store them as FuzzyLocations internally, when it >> is asked to write them to BioSQL they are lost. This is BioSQL has no >> way of storing this information. > > > That's actually not true. BioSQL has the location_qualifier_value table > for storing this, and the foreign key to term to store the location type. > > Bioperl-db does indeed lose this information when persisting feature > locations to BioSQL, but that's Bioperl-db's fault, not BioSQL's. > > Or am I missing something? > > -hilmar -- Richard Holland, BSc MBCS Finance Director, Eagle Genomics Ltd M: +44 7500 438846 | E: [email protected] http://www.eaglegenomics.com/ _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
