3+ years ago we worked on a port of the reference implementation of the H264 
encoder/decoder to Java. Performance was actually very good that we didnt spend 
time on optimization. We used jazillian to do the initial conversion and it 
does a nice job on fairly clean code. They are no longer in business and I plan 
on contacting the developer to see if they would use their software for the 
initial conversion.

Doing a JNI conversion will be fairly easy to model the input and ouput 
paramaters of blast and/or hmmer. Neither code base is setup as a library so 
the number of mappings that need to be performed is minimal. The complexity of 
porting either from C/C++ to Java is high but also introduces a student to the 
field and thus has potential long term benefit.

With JNI high degree of success with minimal work. I would advocate that the 
initial effort is placed on conversion to determine the overall likelyhood of 
success where much will depend on the student. JNI should be a requirement even 
if conversion is successful.

JNI would also minimize GPL concerns of forking the HMMER codebase.

Scooter

----- Reply message -----
From: "Russ Kepler" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [Biojava-l] Porting an Algorithm to Java GSoC 2012
Date: Tue, Mar 20, 2012 8:06 am



On Monday, March 19, 2012 01:10:40 PM Andreas Prlic wrote:

> You are right, this is on a high level how such a conversion could be
> performed.

In my experience Java makes a poor C++ (or C) emulator.  The "convert C++ to
Java" might make an "OK" first pass but in the end you're going to want to
recode critical sections in original Java.  I've found that the really big
performance improvements are in using smarter algorithms in Java vs. some of
the 'brute force' approaches that work in C.
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [email protected]
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l

_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [email protected]
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l

Reply via email to