> Well, section 2.8 (and in more detail section 3.5.5) specifies that we > should keep unreachable entries, but IMHO it does not specify that the > old route is considered selected/installed for a purpose of conditions in > section 3.5.4. The unreachable entry after retraction could be undestood > as a special case, unrelated to any route.
Why does it matter? Isn't the behaviour the same with both interpretations? -- Juliusz
