On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:59:05PM +0200, Alexander Velkov wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > > The first one is RIP request, rest are RIP responses. Quagga apparently do > > not sign RIP requests. They are optional, so it is not a big problem, but > > AFAIK they should be signed and verified in the same way as RIP requests.
This should provide some insights (the paragraphs about RIPv1): http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/docs/docs-multi/RIP-Authentication.html > OK. Yes, the whole communication process to be encrypted sounds more > adequate. I don't think anything is encrypted here, this is just peer authentication using a shared secret.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
