>> I don't think anything is encrypted here, this is just peer authentication using a shared secret.
correct, my mistake :) On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Baptiste Jonglez < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:59:05PM +0200, Alexander Velkov wrote: > > Hi Ondrej, > > > > > The first one is RIP request, rest are RIP responses. Quagga > apparently do > > > not sign RIP requests. They are optional, so it is not a big problem, > but > > > AFAIK they should be signed and verified in the same way as RIP > requests. > > This should provide some insights (the paragraphs about RIPv1): > > http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/docs/docs-multi/RIP-Authentication.html > > > OK. Yes, the whole communication process to be encrypted sounds more > > adequate. > > I don't think anything is encrypted here, this is just peer authentication > using a shared secret. >
